For frequent readers, the only surprise this weekend was the amusing groundswell of interest in my headshot.

There was no surprise in UND’s PWR, which came out right in the meaty part of the curve again — quoting Forecasting the PWR… a look ahead at SCSU, “Split: 77% chance of landing #14 or #15”. The Sioux split, and are #15.

## Forecast

You might think this a boring week for predictions, given that UND doesn’t play. Quite to the contrary, it’s one of the more interesting to date.

Because UND doesn’t play, there’s only a single distribution of where UND is likely to end up. Because UND has no games, all movement through the distribution is caused entirely by other teams’ results. It’s an interesting look at how much PWR is influenced, in just a single weekend, by other teams’ movements.

#14-#15 — 62% likelihood

#13-#16 — 93% likelihood

#8 — 1/1,000,000 chance

## Who else to cheer for?

**Note — updated as of 2:30PM CT, Feb. 2. List was incorrect before then. Hat tip to Siouxweet, see comments below.**

The results this week are a little wonky because of all the split series in which a team is playing two different opponents.

**Denver **winning 2 games (Minnesota Duluth) gives UND an average PWR ranking increase of 1.16

**Minnesota **winning 1 game (Wisconsin) gives UND an average PWR ranking increase of .92 (the sweep increases that to .95)

**Notre Dame** winning 2 games (Ohio St) gives UND an average PWR ranking increase of .92 (1 game gives just .25)

**Massachusetts **winning 2 games (B.C. and Mass Lowell) gives UND an average PWR ranking increase of .86

Others the Sioux want to see win: Harvard (over Yale and BU), Colgate (over Princeton), and Cornell (over Princeton)

TUC cliff quirk of the week: Maine sweeping UNH gives UND a .85 raise, but a single win harms us. Presumably the two wins would push Maine into TUC territory.

## Special Timing Note

Given the Beanpot, note that this forecast includes predictions of tonight’s games to create a predicted PWR as of next Monday, excluding that day’s games.

Jim,

How do these teams ahead of us winning help us move up? wouldn’t Yale losing to Harvard help us more then them beating Harvard. Same thing with Princeton versus Cornell?

You are, of course, exactly right. In my haste to sort through the multiple opponents confusion plaguing the East Coast this week, I posted the list of teams UND wants to LOSE instead of the teams we want to WIN.

This is why I need to automate the process and remove the potential for human error in posting the results (which is quite high when the human is me 😉 )

Corrected, and many thanks for the sharp eyes!

Jim,

You might not get htis before the end of the BU/Harvard game but how will our RPI be affected by this. Would it go up more with a Harvard win beings we beat them twice or by BU which we lost to but has a higher RPI?

To find the precise effect of a single game, you can’t beat John Whelan’s Do-It-Yourself ranking calculator:

http://slack.net/~whelan/tbrw/2009/rankings.diy.shtml

Adding 1 game between Ha and BU, I’m getting for RPI:

Current .5369

BU win over Ha .5371

Ha over BU .5375

For PWR:

Current results #15 (10 comparisons won)

BU win over Ha #15 (10 comparisons won)

Ha over BU #16 (T14-16) (10 comparisons won)